Stonehill vs New Haven — College Basketball, Feb 19, 2026

New Haven beat Stonehill 64–51 at home on Feb 19, 2026.

FinalThu, Feb 19Conference game

Stonehill Skyhawks

9-20 · 4-14 on the road

51

New Haven Chargers

10-16 · 6-5 at home

64

RecapPropsStatsHead to head

Line score◷History

Team	1st	2nd	Final
STO	30	21	51
NHVN	32	32	64

Top performersiEach team's three leading scorers in this game, with rebounds and assists. The full box score is below.◷History

Stonehill Skyhawks

• Chas StinsonG

  13 pts · 12 reb · 1 ast · Double-double
  6-15 FG
• Rex SunderlandG

  8 pts · 4 reb · 1 ast
  3-5 FG

  2-3 3PT
• Ethan MeuserF

  8 pts · 4 reb
  3-6 FG

  1-4 3PT

New Haven Chargers

• Jabri FitzpatrickG

  29 pts · 8 reb · 1 ast · 4 stl
  11-21 FG

  2-5 3PT
• Najimi GeorgeG

  14 pts · 8 reb · 2 ast
  6-13 FG

  1-3 3PT
• Kheni BriggsG

  8 pts · 3 reb · 4 ast
  3-4 FG

  0-1 3PT

Box score◷History

every player+

STO	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Hermann Koffi	39	8	2	0	0	0	1	2-7	2-5	2-2	—
Chas Stinson	33	13	12	1	1	1	1	6-15	0-0	1-2	—
Rex Sunderland	31	8	4	1	0	0	4	3-5	2-3	0-0	—
Ethan Meuser	18	8	4	0	0	1	1	3-6	1-4	1-4	—
Ridvan Tutic	13	0	3	2	0	1	2	0-2	0-0	0-0	—
Davante Hackett	24	7	1	2	1	0	0	3-10	1-5	0-1	—
Trenton Ruth	20	2	1	1	0	0	1	1-6	0-2	0-0	—
Raymond Espinal-Guzman	16	5	3	0	0	0	0	2-5	0-2	1-2	—
Pearse McGuinn	6	0	2	0	0	0	0	0-1	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		51	32	7	2	3	10	20-57	6-21	5-11

NHVN	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Jabri Fitzpatrick	37	29	8	1	4	0	0	11-21	2-5	5-5	—
Najimi George	36	14	8	2	0	2	1	6-13	1-3	1-2	—
Kheni Briggs	31	8	3	4	1	0	1	3-4	0-1	2-4	—
Andre Pasha	29	2	7	0	0	3	1	1-9	0-3	0-0	—
Stefano Faloppa	25	4	2	2	0	0	3	2-9	0-4	0-0	—
Teshaun Steele	26	7	8	0	1	1	1	3-3	0-0	1-1	—
Maison Adeleye	9	0	1	1	0	0	1	0-2	0-1	0-0	—
Aidan Losiewicz	3	0	1	0	0	0	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Kyle Kearson	3	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Zoumana Traore	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		64	38	10	6	6	9	26-61	3-17	9-12

Starters first, then by minutes. +/- is the team's point margin while he was on the floor.

Team statsiTeam stats: green marks the better side; a longer bar is a bigger number, not always a better one.◷History

STONHVN

35.1%

Field goals?Made-attempted: away 20-57, home 26-61.

42.6%

28.6%

Three-pointers?Made-attempted: away 6-21, home 3-17.

17.6%

45.5%

Free throws?Made-attempted: away 5-11, home 9-12.

75.0%

32

Rebounds

43

7

Offensive rebounds

11

7

Assists

10

10

Turnovers?Fewer is better.

10

2

Steals

6

3

Blocks

6

20

Points in the paint

40

0

Fast-break points

10

15

Fouls?Fewer is better.

13

This game's box score totals; green marks the better side (fewer turnovers and fouls are better).

See the model’s call (graded) →

Going into the game · matchup numbers, form, rest+

Offense vs defense: the four factorsiEach offense's league rank against the defense it faces in shooting, turnovers, rebounding and free throws; longer = better.◷History

ranks betterranks worseStronger72+ places apartleague middleLonger bar = better rank of 361 (#1 = best)

STO offensevsNHVN defense

STO offense ranks better in 0 of 4 matchups · NHVN defense in 4 (4 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

46.0%

#347

51.6%

Stronger#187

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

16.9%

#326

15.1%

Stronger#137

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

27.3%

#282

27.2%

Stronger#43

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

18.2%

#357

20.5%

Stronger#39

NHVN offensevsSTO defense

NHVN offense ranks better in 1 of 4 matchups · STO defense in 3 (3 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

48.0%

#310

48.0%

Stronger#40

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

16.5%

#307slight

11.8%

#343

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

22.0%

#353

27.2%

Stronger#44

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

21.7%

#299

20.4%

Stronger#37

Season box-score numbers; ranks of 361 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.

Key numbers and mismatchesiHeadline ratings, then the biggest mismatches between one team's offense and the other's defense.◷History

STONHVN

−9.7 302ndNet rating?Points scored minus points allowed per 100 possessions310th −10.6

94.2 355thOffensive rating?Points scored per 100 possessions351st 96.2

103.9 59thDefensive rating?Points allowed per 100 possessions (rank 1 = allows least)104th 106.7

66.9 243rdPace?Possessions per game (rank 1 = fastest)360th 62.9

Expected pace: about 65 possessions a team (the two teams' average). Rank among 361 teams, 1st = best.

Where one side has the better of it

• 
  NHVN turnovers

  NHVN offense 16.5% (307th) vs STO defense allowing 11.8% (343rd)
  +36 spots

ContextiEach team's last ten days going into this game (filled = home, outline = road; travel distance is not tracked)◷History

last 10 days

TWTFSSMTWGame

STO

CHST

WAG

NHVN

4 days rest

TWTFSSMTWGame

NHVN

CCSU

LIU

STO

4 days rest4th straight home game

homeroadday offthis gameFrom the schedule; travel distance is not tracked.

STO · last 10

9-20 · 4 days rest

• Feb 14 vs WAGL 57–68
• Feb 12 @ CHSTL 55–68
• Feb 7 @ LIUL 54–61
• Feb 5 @ FDUL 58–74
• Jan 31 @ LEMW 65–54
• Jan 29 vs FDUW 58–57
• Jan 26 vs CCSUW 61–59
• Jan 23 vs LIUL 63–66
• Jan 17 @ MERCW 62–57
• Jan 10 vs CHSTW 85–82

5-5 in these

NHVN · last 10

10-16 · 4 days rest

• Feb 14 vs LIUW 55–52
• Feb 12 vs CCSUL 76–81
• Feb 7 vs CHSTL 57–63
• Feb 5 @ LIUL 55–60
• Jan 29 @ MERCL 51–70
• Jan 23 vs MERCL 57–61
• Jan 19 @ CHSTW 62–56
• Jan 17 vs WAGW 80–74
• Jan 10 vs FDUW 65–55
• Jan 8 @ LEML 47–73

4-6 in these

From box scores. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM and Caesars; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.