Bradley vs Southern Illinois — College Basketball, Feb 15, 2026

Bradley beat Southern Illinois 70–60 at Southern Illinois on Feb 15, 2026.

FinalSun, Feb 15Conference game

Bradley Braves

20-12 · 4-8 on the road

70

Southern Illinois Salukis

15-16 · 7-8 at home

60

RecapPropsStatsHead to head

Line score◷History

Team	1st	2nd	Final
BRAD	28	42	70
SIU	28	32	60

Top performersiEach team's three leading scorers in this game, with rebounds and assists. The full box score is below.◷History

Bradley Braves

• Jaquan JohnsonG

  24 pts · 7 reb · 3 ast · 3 stl
  9-18 FG

  2-5 3PT
• Alex HuibregtseG

  14 pts · 2 reb
  5-9 FG

  4-8 3PT
• Ahmet JonovicC

  8 pts · 3 reb · 3 ast · 3 blk
  4-7 FG

Southern Illinois Salukis

• Quel'Ron HouseG

  26 pts · 3 reb · 1 ast
  10-19 FG

  0-1 3PT
• Davion SykesG

  12 pts · 5 reb · 1 ast
  5-7 FG
• Drew SteffeG

  6 pts · 2 reb · 2 ast
  3-15 FG

  0-8 3PT

Box score◷History

every player+

BRAD	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Alex Huibregtse	32	14	2	0	1	0	0	5-9	4-8	0-1	—
Jaquan Johnson	31	24	7	3	3	0	1	9-18	2-5	4-4	—
Ahmet Jonovic	27	8	3	3	0	3	2	4-7	0-0	0-0	—
AJ Smith	26	5	5	2	0	0	0	2-6	1-4	0-0	—
Corey Thomas	24	3	4	0	1	5	0	1-4	1-4	0-2	—
Timoty van der Knaap	26	5	7	1	0	0	1	2-7	0-3	1-2	—
Montana Wheeler	19	6	0	1	1	0	0	3-9	0-1	0-0	—
Kai Yu	12	5	3	1	0	0	0	2-4	1-2	0-0	—
Dietrich Richardson	2	0	0	0	0	0	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Demarion Burch	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	0-1	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		70	32	11	6	8	5	28-65	9-27	5-9

SIU	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Drew Steffe	37	6	2	2	2	1	2	3-15	0-8	0-0	—
Quel'Ron House	33	26	3	1	1	0	3	10-19	0-1	6-6	—
Damien Mayo Jr.	31	4	6	2	1	2	0	1-6	0-2	2-2	—
Rolyns Aligbe	22	5	9	0	1	1	1	0-4	0-3	5-6	—
Prince Aligbe	19	0	5	0	0	0	0	0-2	0-0	0-2	—
Davion Sykes	21	12	5	1	0	1	1	5-7	0-0	2-2	—
Jalen Haynes	19	5	1	2	0	1	2	2-5	0-1	1-1	—
Jaheem Webber	15	2	4	0	0	1	0	1-2	0-0	0-0	—
Max Pikaar	3	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		60	35	8	5	7	9	22-60	0-15	16-19

Starters first, then by minutes. +/- is the team's point margin while he was on the floor.

Team statsiTeam stats: green marks the better side; a longer bar is a bigger number, not always a better one.◷History

BRADSIU

43.1%

Field goals?Made-attempted: away 28-65, home 22-60.

36.7%

33.3%

Three-pointers?Made-attempted: away 9-27, home 0-15.

0.0%

55.6%

Free throws?Made-attempted: away 5-9, home 16-19.

84.2%

37

Rebounds

39

8

Offensive rebounds

9

11

Assists

8

7

Turnovers?Fewer is better.

10

6

Steals

5

8

Blocks

7

32

Points in the paint

36

8

Fast-break points

7

18

Fouls?Fewer is better.

13

This game's box score totals; green marks the better side (fewer turnovers and fouls are better).

See the model’s call (graded) →

Going into the game · matchup numbers, form, rest+

Offense vs defense: the four factorsiEach offense's league rank against the defense it faces in shooting, turnovers, rebounding and free throws; longer = better.◷History

ranks betterranks worseStronger72+ places apartleague middleLonger bar = better rank of 361 (#1 = best)

BRAD offensevsSIU defense

BRAD offense ranks better in 1 of 4 matchups · SIU defense in 3 (2 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

51.0%

#189

49.0%

Stronger#69

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

12.3%

#21slight

16.3%

#69

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

27.3%

#283

27.3%

Stronger#49

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

26.8%

#136

21.8%

slight#67

SIU offensevsBRAD defense

SIU offense ranks better in 0 of 4 matchups · BRAD defense in 4 (3 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

49.2%

#283

52.6%

slight#240

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

14.8%

#203

17.1%

Stronger#32

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

30.9%

#166

28.2%

Stronger#79

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

21.3%

#308

26.6%

Stronger#227

Season box-score numbers; ranks of 361 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.

Key numbers and mismatchesiHeadline ratings, then the biggest mismatches between one team's offense and the other's defense.◷History

BRADSIU

+4.7 105thNet rating?Points scored minus points allowed per 100 possessions124th +3.2

111.4 129thOffensive rating?Points scored per 100 possessions289th 103.9

106.6 100thDefensive rating?Points allowed per 100 possessions (rank 1 = allows least)24th 100.7

69.4 104thPace?Possessions per game (rank 1 = fastest)84th 69.9

Expected pace: about 70 possessions a team (the two teams' average). Rank among 361 teams, 1st = best.

Where one side has the better of it

• 
  BRAD turnovers

  BRAD offense 12.3% (21st) vs SIU defense allowing 16.3% (69th)
  +48 spots

ContextiEach team's last ten days going into this game (filled = home, outline = road; travel distance is not tracked)◷History

last 10 days

FSSMTWTFSGame

BRAD

UNI

BEL

SIU

5 days rest

FSSMTWTFSGame

SIU

MUR

INST

EVAN

BRAD

2 days rest

homeroadday offthis gameFrom the schedule; travel distance is not tracked.

BRAD · last 10

20-12 · 5 days rest

• Feb 9 vs BELW 95–84
• Feb 6 @ UNIL 49–61
• Feb 3 vs VALW 72–65
• Jan 31 @ DRKEW 87–73
• Jan 24 vs UICL 70–85
• Jan 21 vs INSTW 75–68
• Jan 17 @ ILSTL 62–88
• Jan 13 @ EVANW 94–90
• Jan 10 vs UNIW 75–69
• Jan 7 vs DRKEW 93–66

7-3 in these

SIU · last 10

15-16 · 2 days rest

• Feb 12 vs EVANW 86–60
• Feb 9 @ INSTW 80–65
• Feb 6 vs MURL 81–91
• Feb 3 @ ILSTW 54–50
• Jan 31 vs UICL 66–68
• Jan 28 vs UNIW 65–50
• Jan 21 @ VALL 63–69
• Jan 17 vs BELL 68–73
• Jan 14 vs DRKEL 73–76
• Jan 7 @ UICL 57–70

4-6 in these

From box scores. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM and Caesars; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.