Loading the game…
⌘K
Pacific beat Pepperdine 92–59 at Pepperdine on Feb 7, 2026.
| Team | 1st | 2nd | Final |
|---|---|---|---|
  PAC | 41 | 51 | 92 |
  PEPP | 25 | 34 | 59 |
Pacific TigersPepperdine Waves| PAC | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3PT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaden Clayton | 36 | 17 | 8 | 8 | 6-10 | 3-5 |
| Elias Ralph | 33 | 14 | 13 | 4 | 6-12 | 1-4 |
| TJ Wainwright | 28 | 27 | 4 | 2 | 8-17 | 6-10 |
| Isaac Jack | 24 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 4-6 | 0-0 |
| Justin Rochelin | 16 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 4-6 | 2-2 |
| Jaion Pitt | 23 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Kajus Kublickas | 17 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| KC Ibekwe | 15 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1-5 | 0-0 |
| Alexis Marmolejos | 6 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 2-2 | 2-2 |
| Emmanuel Manyuon | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Totals | 92 | 43 | 21 | 33-62 | 14-23 |
| PEPP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3PT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Styles Phipps | 32 | 7 | 6 | 3 | 2-10 | 0-2 |
| Javon Cooley | 30 | 15 | 5 | 1 | 5-9 | 2-5 |
| Aaron Clark | 29 | 17 | 0 | 2 | 5-13 | 3-5 |
| Danilo Dožic | 29 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 3-10 | 2-5 |
| Yonatan Levy | 22 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| Pavle Stošic | 15 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| Stefan Cicic | 11 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| David Mager | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| Luka Vudragovic | 10 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Vladimir Sudar | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Nikola Radovanovic | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Pasha Shemirani | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Totals | 59 | 26 | 8 | 20-56 | 7-19 |
Starters first, then by minutes. +/- is the team's point margin while he was on the floor.
This game's box score totals; green marks the better side (fewer turnovers and fouls are better).
PAC offense ranks better in 2 of 4 matchups (2 by a clear margin) · PEPP defense in 2 (2 by a clear margin)
PEPP offense ranks better in 1 of 4 matchups · PAC defense in 3 (2 by a clear margin)
Season box-score numbers; ranks of 361 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.
PACPEPPExpected pace: about 67 possessions a team (the two teams' average). Rank among 361 teams, 1st = best.
PACPEPPNo lines posted yet: research the rotation against any number
Elias Ralph's full breakdown holds the game-by-game chart, hit-rate splits and filters, the what-if line and market curve, every book and the line history, closing lines, the projected range, teammates and matchup tools. Checking your player views…
Checking your player views…| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elias Ralph | 34.0 | 15.5 | 6.2 | 2.1 |
| TJ Wainwright | 32.5 | 13.7 | 3.6 | 1.5 |
| Jaden Clayton | 31.3 | 6.7 | 3.1 | 6.5 |
| Justin Rochelin | 31.2 | 12.0 | 7.1 | 1.3 |
| Isaac Jack | 24.8 | 10.1 | 5.7 | 0.5 |
| Kajus Kublickas | 18.1 | 5.3 | 2.1 | 2.9 |
| Jaion Pitt | 16.6 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 0.4 |
| Alexis Marmolejos | 8.2 | 2.8 | 1.4 | 0.3 |
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Styles Phipps | 34.3 | 14.7 | 6.2 | 4.3 |
| Aaron Clark | 33.6 | 13.7 | 3.5 | 2.7 |
| Danilo Dožic | 31.8 | 11.0 | 2.8 | 1.5 |
| Javon Cooley | 29.1 | 10.7 | 4.4 | 0.8 |
| Yonatan Levy | 22.8 | 5.8 | 4.0 | 1.5 |
| Pavle Stošic | 15.7 | 3.4 | 3.1 | 0.7 |
| Luka Vudragovic | 10.5 | 2.5 | 1.1 | 0.2 |
| David Mager | 9.4 | 2.9 | 0.9 | 0.1 |
PAC offenseper gamePEPP defenseRank among 361 teams, 1st = best; a longer bar is a better rank. A defense ranks well for allowing less: lower shooting percentages, fewer points and rebounds, more turnovers forced.
PACForAgainst48% of PAC's points come in the first half, 47% for the average team.
PEPPForAgainst48% of PEPP's points come in the first half, 47% for the average team.
Average points per game in each period, from box scores, over a team's last 17 games; overtime is pooled into the second half and the game. History, not a forecast: a team that leads late plays differently than one that trails, and a small window swings.
PAC 5series5 PEPP| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2026 | PAC 92 | PEPP 59 | PAC+33 | +33 |
| Jan 4, 2026 | PEPP 69 | PAC 74 | PAC+5 | +5 |
| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2025 | PAC 44 | PEPP 60 | PEPP+16 | +16 |
| Jan 4, 2025 | PEPP 87 | PAC 70 | PEPP+17 | +17 |
| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2024 | PAC 43 | PEPP 102 | PEPP+59 | +59 |
| Feb 21, 2024 | PEPP 89 | PAC 70 | PEPP+19 | +19 |
| Jan 11, 2024 | PAC 78 | PEPP 93 | PEPP+15 | +15 |
| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2023 | PEPP 71 | PAC 84 | PAC+13 | +13 |
| Feb 2, 2023 | PEPP 73 | PAC 81 | PAC+8 | +8 |
| Jan 7, 2023 | PAC 80 | PEPP 75 | PAC+5 | +5 |
From box scores. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM and Caesars; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.
