Marist vs Fairfield — College Basketball, Feb 7, 2026

Fairfield beat Marist 63–60 at home on Feb 7, 2026.

FinalSat, Feb 7Conference game

Marist Red Foxes

18-12 · 8-8 on the road

60

Fairfield Stags

20-13 · 12-4 at home

63

RecapPropsStatsHead to head

Line score◷History

Team	1st	2nd	Final
MRST	25	35	60
FAIR	28	35	63

Top performersiEach team's three leading scorers in this game, with rebounds and assists. The full box score is below.◷History

Marist Red Foxes

• Justin MenardG

  18 pts · 6 reb · 2 ast
  7-14 FG

  2-5 3PT
• Jadin Collins-RobertsG

  14 pts · 5 reb · 2 ast
  5-10 FG

  2-2 3PT
• Rhyjon BlackwellG

  7 pts · 5 reb · 4 ast
  3-9 FG

  0-3 3PT

Fairfield Stags

• Braden SparksG

  20 pts · 4 reb · 2 ast
  7-17 FG

  4-11 3PT
• Declan WucherpfennigG

  14 pts · 8 reb · 3 ast
  6-9 FG

  0-2 3PT
• Brandon BenjaminF

  13 pts · 12 reb · 3 stl · Double-double
  5-8 FG

Box score◷History

every player+

MRST	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Justin Menard	36	18	6	2	0	1	3	7-14	2-5	2-2	—
Jadin Collins-Roberts	36	14	5	2	0	0	2	5-10	2-2	2-2	—
Elijah Lewis	17	2	3	0	1	0	2	0-5	0-2	2-2	—
Trace Salton	16	2	4	0	0	1	0	0-2	0-2	2-2	—
Jason Schofield	15	7	3	1	1	0	1	3-7	0-0	1-2	—
Rhyjon Blackwell	31	7	5	4	0	0	2	3-9	0-3	1-1	—
Parby Kabamba	23	5	5	1	0	0	0	1-4	1-3	2-2	—
Myles Parker	22	5	2	0	0	0	0	2-2	1-1	0-0	—
Jaden Daughtry	2	0	0	0	0	0	2	0-1	0-1	0-0	—
Jordan Gabriel	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-1	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		60	33	10	2	2	12	21-55	6-19	12-13

FAIR	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Braden Sparks	38	20	4	2	1	0	1	7-17	4-11	2-2	—
Declan Wucherpfennig	36	14	8	3	1	1	1	6-9	0-2	2-3	—
Brandon Benjamin	32	13	12	0	3	2	1	5-8	0-0	3-5	—
Tony Williams	26	6	1	4	1	0	1	2-7	2-6	0-0	—
Halon Rawlins	15	0	0	1	1	0	0	0-2	0-1	0-0	—
Deuce Turner	24	10	1	2	0	0	1	3-11	1-7	3-3	—
Eric Mejia	14	0	1	0	2	0	0	0-1	0-0	0-0	—
Ryan Zan	8	0	1	0	0	0	1	0-1	0-1	0-0	—
Isaac Munkadi	4	0	1	0	0	2	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Cam Estevez	3	0	1	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		63	30	12	9	5	7	23-56	7-28	10-13

Starters first, then by minutes. +/- is the team's point margin while he was on the floor.

Team statsiTeam stats: green marks the better side; a longer bar is a bigger number, not always a better one.◷History

MRSTFAIR

38.2%

Field goals?Made-attempted: away 21-55, home 23-56.

41.1%

31.6%

Three-pointers?Made-attempted: away 6-19, home 7-28.

25.0%

92.3%

Free throws?Made-attempted: away 12-13, home 10-13.

76.9%

38

Rebounds

31

12

Offensive rebounds

9

10

Assists

12

12

Turnovers?Fewer is better.

8

2

Steals

9

2

Blocks

5

24

Points in the paint

26

2

Fast-break points

5

11

Fouls?Fewer is better.

13

This game's box score totals; green marks the better side (fewer turnovers and fouls are better).

See the model’s call (graded) →

Going into the game · matchup numbers, form, rest+

Offense vs defense: the four factorsiEach offense's league rank against the defense it faces in shooting, turnovers, rebounding and free throws; longer = better.◷History

ranks betterranks worseStronger72+ places apartleague middleLonger bar = better rank of 361 (#1 = best)

MRST offensevsFAIR defense

MRST offense ranks better in 0 of 4 matchups · FAIR defense in 4 (3 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

49.3%

#274

51.0%

Stronger#158

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

14.8%

#205

14.7%

slight#163

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

29.1%

#230

29.1%

Stronger#116

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

20.0%

#335

22.4%

Stronger#80

FAIR offensevsMRST defense

FAIR offense ranks better in 1 of 4 matchups · MRST defense in 3 (2 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

48.8%

#290

45.6%

Stronger#7

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

12.9%

#49

17.0%

slight#36

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

35.8%

#32slight

28.3%

#81

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

19.5%

#342

26.2%

Stronger#215

Season box-score numbers; ranks of 361 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.

Key numbers and mismatchesiHeadline ratings, then the biggest mismatches between one team's offense and the other's defense.◷History

MRSTFAIR

+7.5 74thNet rating?Points scored minus points allowed per 100 possessions152nd +1.5

104.2 285thOffensive rating?Points scored per 100 possessions176th 109.3

96.7 4thDefensive rating?Points allowed per 100 possessions (rank 1 = allows least)125th 107.8

66.1 281stPace?Possessions per game (rank 1 = fastest)252nd 66.7

Expected pace: about 66 possessions a team (the two teams' average). Rank among 361 teams, 1st = best.

Where one side has the better of it

• 
  FAIR offensive rebounding

  FAIR offense 35.8% (32nd) vs MRST defense allowing 28.3% (81st)
  +49 spots

ContextiEach team's last ten days going into this game (filled = home, outline = road; travel distance is not tracked)◷History

last 10 days

TFSSMTWTFGame

MRST

CAN

NIA

RID

FAIR

1 day rest

TFSSMTWTFGame

FAIR

IONA

QUIN

SHU

MRST

1 day rest

homeroadday offthis gameFrom the schedule; travel distance is not tracked.

MRST · last 10

18-12 · 1 day rest

• Feb 5 vs RIDW 81–52
• Feb 1 @ NIAW 58–46
• Jan 30 @ CANW 88–86
• Jan 24 vs QUINW 71–64
• Jan 22 @ SIEL 50–69
• Jan 19 vs MRMKL 55–68
• Jan 17 vs FAIRW 82–67
• Jan 11 @ RIDW 71–49
• Jan 9 @ SHUW 76–72
• Jan 4 vs IONAW 83–38

8-2 in these

FAIR · last 10

20-13 · 1 day rest

• Feb 5 @ SHUW 92–87
• Feb 1 vs QUINL 65–72
• Jan 30 @ IONAW 71–70
• Jan 24 vs CANW 61–55
• Jan 22 vs NIAW 62–61
• Jan 19 @ SIEL 77–85
• Jan 17 @ MRSTL 67–82
• Jan 14 vs MANW 98–62
• Jan 9 vs RIDW 68–62
• Jan 4 @ NIAW 83–75

7-3 in these

From box scores. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM and Caesars; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.