Loading the game…
⌘K
The Citadel beat Chattanooga 78–71 at Chattanooga on Feb 7, 2026.
| Team | 1st | 2nd | Final |
|---|---|---|---|
  CIT | 37 | 41 | 78 |
  UTC | 32 | 39 | 71 |
The Citadel BulldogsChattanooga Mocs| CIT | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3PT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sola Adebisi | 37 | 18 | 5 | 1 | 8-12 | 0-2 |
| Braxton Williams | 37 | 18 | 0 | 1 | 7-14 | 4-10 |
| Carter Kingsbury | 35 | 16 | 6 | 2 | 6-12 | 2-5 |
| Eze Wali | 31 | 11 | 2 | 5 | 3-7 | 1-4 |
| Simeon German | 15 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| Logan Applegate | 21 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 2-4 | 2-4 |
| Keynan Davis | 15 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1-5 | 0-4 |
| Marcos Gonzales | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Dante Kearse | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Totals | 78 | 27 | 14 | 29-58 | 9-29 |
| UTC | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3PT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brennan Watkins | 33 | 15 | 2 | 3 | 6-12 | 3-8 |
| Tate Darner | 30 | 9 | 7 | 3 | 3-7 | 1-3 |
| Houston Holland | 23 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 2-7 | 0-3 |
| Teddy Washington Jr. | 14 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1-8 | 0-4 |
| Makai Richards | 12 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Jordan Frison | 29 | 24 | 3 | 3 | 10-17 | 2-5 |
| Collin Mulholland | 20 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 2-3 | 0-1 |
| Jikari Johnson | 13 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 3-6 | 3-4 |
| Parker Robison | 11 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Billy Smith | 8 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-1 |
| Josh Bowman | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Totals | 71 | 28 | 17 | 28-63 | 9-29 |
Starters first, then by minutes. +/- is the team's point margin while he was on the floor.
This game's box score totals; green marks the better side (fewer turnovers and fouls are better).
CIT offense ranks better in 1 of 4 matchups (1 by a clear margin) · UTC defense in 3
UTC offense ranks better in 2 of 4 matchups (2 by a clear margin) · CIT defense in 2 (2 by a clear margin)
Season box-score numbers; ranks of 361 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.
CITUTCExpected pace: about 66 possessions a team (the two teams' average). Rank among 361 teams, 1st = best.
CITUTCNo lines posted yet: research the rotation against any number
Jordan Frison's full breakdown holds the game-by-game chart, hit-rate splits and filters, the what-if line and market curve, every book and the line history, closing lines, the projected range, teammates and matchup tools. Checking your player views…
Checking your player views…| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sola Adebisi | 33.7 | 7.2 | 6.5 | 1.5 |
| Braxton Williams | 30.7 | 14.3 | 2.9 | 1.8 |
| Carter Kingsbury | 30.2 | 11.5 | 3.8 | 2.7 |
| Eze Wali | 26.1 | 4.4 | 3.7 | 2.6 |
| Christian Moore | 25.4 | 11.7 | 3.3 | 0.9 |
| Logan Applegate | 18.5 | 8.5 | 2.6 | 1.0 |
| Marcos Gonzales | 14.0 | 4.6 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Simeon German | 10.6 | 1.8 | 2.9 | 0.2 |
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Frison | 30.9 | 15.8 | 3.7 | 3.7 |
| Tate Darner | 29.5 | 10.3 | 4.3 | 2.2 |
| Brennan Watkins | 27.8 | 10.7 | 3.1 | 1.5 |
| Billy Smith | 23.9 | 7.5 | 3.2 | 0.9 |
| Teddy Washington Jr. | 19.9 | 8.4 | 2.8 | 1.1 |
| Jikari Johnson | 14.6 | 7.1 | 2.3 | 0.6 |
| Collin Mulholland | 14.2 | 6.1 | 2.4 | 0.7 |
| Josh Bowman | 13.7 | 3.3 | 2.5 | 0.9 |
CIT offenseper gameUTC defenseRank among 361 teams, 1st = best; a longer bar is a better rank. A defense ranks well for allowing less: lower shooting percentages, fewer points and rebounds, more turnovers forced.
CITForAgainst47% of CIT's points come in the first half, 47% for the average team.
UTCForAgainst46% of UTC's points come in the first half, 47% for the average team.
Average points per game in each period, from box scores, over a team's last 17 games; overtime is pooled into the second half and the game. History, not a forecast: a team that leads late plays differently than one that trails, and a small window swings.
CIT 4series6 UTC| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2026 | CIT 88 | UTC 85 | CIT+3 | +3 |
| Feb 21, 2026 | UTC 93 | CIT 72 | UTC+21 | +21 |
| Feb 7, 2026 | CIT 78 | UTC 71 | CIT+7 | +7 |
| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2025 | CIT 75 | UTC 76 | UTC+1 | +1 |
| Jan 4, 2025 | UTC 81 | CIT 68 | UTC+13 | +13 |
| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2024 | UTC 62 | CIT 71 | CIT+9 | +9 |
| Jan 27, 2024 | CIT 62 | UTC 90 | UTC+28 | +28 |
| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2023 | CIT 63 | UTC 82 | UTC+19 | +19 |
| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2022 | UTC 68 | CIT 76 | CIT+8 | +8 |
| Mar 5, 2022 | CIT 66 | UTC 71 | UTC+5 | +5 |
From box scores. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM and Caesars; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.
