Marist vs Niagara — College Basketball, Feb 1, 2026

Marist beat Niagara 58–46 at Niagara on Feb 1, 2026.

FinalSun, Feb 1Conference game

Marist Red Foxes

18-12 · 8-8 on the road

58

Niagara Purple Eagles

7-22 · 5-7 at home

46

RecapPropsStatsHead to head

Line score◷History

Team	1st	2nd	Final
MRST	27	31	58
NIA	19	27	46

Top performersiEach team's three leading scorers in this game, with rebounds and assists. The full box score is below.◷History

Marist Red Foxes

• Rhyjon BlackwellG

  13 pts · 2 reb · 2 ast
  3-7 FG

  1-2 3PT
• Elijah LewisG

  10 pts · 6 reb
  4-10 FG

  0-1 3PT
• Jadin Collins-RobertsG

  9 pts · 4 reb · 1 ast
  4-8 FG

  1-2 3PT

Niagara Purple Eagles

• Justin HawkinsF

  14 pts · 3 reb · 1 ast
  5-10 FG

  2-3 3PT
• Trenton WaltersG

  10 pts · 2 reb · 4 ast
  3-11 FG

  1-3 3PT
• Vice ZankiF

  7 pts · 5 reb
  2-4 FG

  1-3 3PT

Box score◷History

every player+

MRST	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Elijah Lewis	30	10	6	0	0	0	1	4-10	0-1	2-2	—
Jadin Collins-Roberts	30	9	4	1	1	0	2	4-8	1-2	0-0	—
Justin Menard	29	9	1	4	0	0	1	3-9	1-3	2-2	—
Jaden Daughtry	24	8	3	2	2	2	1	4-6	0-1	0-0	—
Jason Schofield	21	5	5	0	1	3	0	1-4	0-0	3-4	—
Rhyjon Blackwell	30	13	2	2	1	0	3	3-7	1-2	6-6	—
Parby Kabamba	16	2	7	0	0	2	0	1-3	0-2	0-1	—
Myles Parker	10	2	3	0	0	0	0	1-2	0-1	0-0	—
Trace Salton	4	0	0	0	1	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Martin Kawa	3	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Jordan Gabriel	3	0	1	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		58	32	9	6	7	8	21-49	3-12	13-15

NIA	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Landon Williams	35	3	3	1	1	0	3	1-8	1-4	0-0	—
Justin Hawkins	29	14	3	1	0	1	4	5-10	2-3	2-5	—
Vice Zanki	26	7	5	0	0	0	0	2-4	1-3	2-2	—
Reggie Prudhomme	23	5	3	2	2	0	2	2-7	1-3	0-0	—
Josiah Sabino	15	0	4	0	1	0	0	0-7	0-0	0-0	—
Trenton Walters	29	10	2	4	1	0	3	3-11	1-3	3-3	—
Will Shortt	23	4	4	1	0	0	1	2-3	0-0	0-1	—
Drew Larson	13	3	5	0	0	0	0	1-3	1-2	0-0	—
Gael Dalmau	4	0	1	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Brian Griffith	3	0	0	0	1	0	0	0-2	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		46	30	9	6	1	13	16-55	7-18	7-11

Starters first, then by minutes. +/- is the team's point margin while he was on the floor.

Team statsiTeam stats: green marks the better side; a longer bar is a bigger number, not always a better one.◷History

MRSTNIA

42.9%

Field goals?Made-attempted: away 21-49, home 16-55.

29.1%

25.0%

Three-pointers?Made-attempted: away 3-12, home 7-18.

38.9%

86.7%

Free throws?Made-attempted: away 13-15, home 7-11.

63.6%

34

Rebounds

39

4

Offensive rebounds

13

9

Assists

9

8

Turnovers?Fewer is better.

15

6

Steals

6

7

Blocks

1

28

Points in the paint

18

4

Fast-break points

5

14

Fouls?Fewer is better.

14

This game's box score totals; green marks the better side (fewer turnovers and fouls are better).

See the model’s call (graded) →

Going into the game · matchup numbers, form, rest+

Offense vs defense: the four factorsiEach offense's league rank against the defense it faces in shooting, turnovers, rebounding and free throws; longer = better.◷History

ranks betterranks worseStronger72+ places apartleague middleLonger bar = better rank of 361 (#1 = best)

MRST offensevsNIA defense

MRST offense ranks better in 1 of 4 matchups · NIA defense in 3 (1 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

49.3%

#274

52.8%

slight#254

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

14.8%

#205

14.4%

slight#186

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

29.1%

#230slight

32.9%

#297

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

20.0%

#335

26.3%

Stronger#220

NIA offensevsMRST defense

NIA offense ranks better in 0 of 4 matchups · MRST defense in 4 (4 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

50.5%

#216

45.6%

Stronger#7

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

16.9%

#327

17.0%

Stronger#36

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

24.8%

#340

28.3%

Stronger#81

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

19.2%

#348

26.2%

Stronger#215

Season box-score numbers; ranks of 361 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.

Key numbers and mismatchesiHeadline ratings, then the biggest mismatches between one team's offense and the other's defense.◷History

MRSTNIA

+7.5 74thNet rating?Points scored minus points allowed per 100 possessions329th −13.4

104.2 285thOffensive rating?Points scored per 100 possessions326th 100.8

96.7 4thDefensive rating?Points allowed per 100 possessions (rank 1 = allows least)285th 114.2

66.1 281stPace?Possessions per game (rank 1 = fastest)361st 62.8

Expected pace: about 64 possessions a team (the two teams' average). Rank among 361 teams, 1st = best.

Where one side has the better of it

• 
  MRST offensive rebounding

  MRST offense 29.1% (230th) vs NIA defense allowing 32.9% (297th)
  +67 spots

ContextiEach team's last ten days going into this game (filled = home, outline = road; travel distance is not tracked)◷History

last 10 days

FSSMTWTFSGame

MRST

QUIN

CAN

NIA

1 day rest

FSSMTWTFSGame

NIA

SHU

SIE

MRST

1 day rest

homeroadday offthis gameFrom the schedule; travel distance is not tracked.

MRST · last 10

18-12 · 1 day rest

• Jan 30 @ CANW 88–86
• Jan 24 vs QUINW 71–64
• Jan 22 @ SIEL 50–69
• Jan 19 vs MRMKL 55–68
• Jan 17 vs FAIRW 82–67
• Jan 11 @ RIDW 71–49
• Jan 9 @ SHUW 76–72
• Jan 4 vs IONAW 83–38
• Jan 2 @ SPUL 59–69
• Dec 29 @ QUINL 58–64

6-4 in these

NIA · last 10

7-22 · 1 day rest

• Jan 30 vs SIEL 79–82
• Jan 24 @ SHUL 70–71
• Jan 22 @ FAIRL 61–62
• Jan 19 vs MSML 58–68
• Jan 14 @ CANW 59–54
• Jan 11 @ MANL 70–79
• Jan 9 @ IONAL 53–71
• Jan 4 vs FAIRL 75–83
• Jan 2 vs SHUW 64–61
• Dec 15 @ VCUL 58–84

2-8 in these

From box scores. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM and Caesars; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.