UTEP vs Seattle U — College Basketball, Dec 7, 2025

Seattle U beat UTEP 75–68 at home on Dec 7, 2025.

FinalSun, Dec 7

UTEP Miners

8-20 · 2-12 on the road

68

Seattle U Redhawks

18-13 · 13-4 at home

75

RecapPropsStatsHead to head

Line score◷History

Team	1st	2nd	Final
UTEP	31	37	68
SEA	37	38	75

Top performersiEach team's three leading scorers in this game, with rebounds and assists. The full box score is below.◷History

UTEP Miners

• Jamal West Jr.F

  21 pts · 14 reb · 1 ast · Double-double
  8-11 FG
• Elijah JonesF

  18 pts · 3 reb · 1 ast
  7-13 FG

  2-8 3PT
• Trey Horton IIIG

  9 pts · 1 reb
  3-6 FG

  2-5 3PT

Seattle U Redhawks

• Brayden MaldonadoG

  28 pts · 4 reb · 2 ast · 3 stl
  9-13 FG

  5-9 3PT
• Will HeimbrodtF

  13 pts · 4 reb · 4 ast · 3 stl
  4-11 FG

  1-4 3PT
• Austin MaurerC

  11 pts · 8 reb
  4-9 FG

  0-2 3PT

Box score◷History

every player+

UTEP	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Jamal West Jr.	36	21	14	1	0	1	2	8-11	0-0	5-6	—
Elijah Jones	25	18	3	1	1	1	1	7-13	2-8	2-3	—
Trey Horton III	25	9	1	0	1	0	2	3-6	2-5	1-1	—
Caleb Blackwell	25	2	1	2	0	0	1	1-4	0-0	0-1	—
Tyreese Watson	19	4	2	1	1	0	5	2-5	0-2	0-0	—
KJ Thomas	27	5	1	3	1	0	2	2-2	1-1	0-0	—
Kaseem Watson	25	7	3	0	2	0	0	3-12	0-2	1-2	—
Bobby Montgomery Jr.	8	2	2	0	0	0	0	1-2	0-1	0-0	—
Mouhamed Mbaye	7	0	2	0	0	1	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
C.J. Smith	2	0	0	0	1	0	0	0-1	0-0	0-0	—
David Tubek	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-1	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		68	29	8	7	3	13	27-57	5-19	9-13

SEA	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Will Heimbrodt	33	13	4	4	3	1	2	4-11	1-4	4-6	—
Maleek Arington	33	4	3	5	2	0	3	1-3	1-1	1-2	—
Brayden Maldonado	32	28	4	2	3	0	2	9-13	5-9	5-5	—
Junseok Yeo	32	9	1	1	0	1	0	2-7	1-5	4-6	—
Houran Dan	8	0	2	0	0	1	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Austin Maurer	19	11	8	0	0	2	1	4-9	0-2	3-4	—
John Christofilis	16	6	2	0	0	0	1	2-3	2-2	0-0	—
Miles Amos	15	0	3	0	1	0	1	0-1	0-0	0-0	—
Brock Felder	8	2	3	0	0	0	2	1-2	0-0	0-1	—
Jojo Murphy	4	2	0	0	0	0	0	1-2	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		75	30	12	9	5	12	24-51	10-23	17-24

Starters first, then by minutes. +/- is the team's point margin while he was on the floor.

Team statsiTeam stats: green marks the better side; a longer bar is a bigger number, not always a better one.◷History

UTEPSEA

47.4%

Field goals?Made-attempted: away 27-57, home 24-51.

47.1%

26.3%

Three-pointers?Made-attempted: away 5-19, home 10-23.

43.5%

69.2%

Free throws?Made-attempted: away 9-13, home 17-24.

70.8%

29

Rebounds

33

8

Offensive rebounds

10

8

Assists

12

13

Turnovers?Fewer is better.

12

7

Steals

9

3

Blocks

5

36

Points in the paint

26

12

Fast-break points

3

20

Fouls?Fewer is better.

14

This game's box score totals; green marks the better side (fewer turnovers and fouls are better).

See the model’s call (graded) →

Going into the game · matchup numbers, form, rest+

Offense vs defense: the four factorsiEach offense's league rank against the defense it faces in shooting, turnovers, rebounding and free throws; longer = better.◷History

ranks betterranks worseStronger72+ places apartleague middleLonger bar = better rank of 361 (#1 = best)

UTEP offensevsSEA defense

UTEP offense ranks better in 0 of 4 matchups · SEA defense in 4 (3 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

48.3%

#306

48.3%

Stronger#46

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

15.4%

#246

18.5%

Stronger#12

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

26.2%

#314

31.8%

slight#244

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

23.5%

#232

24.4%

Stronger#141

SEA offensevsUTEP defense

SEA offense ranks better in 1 of 4 matchups (1 by a clear margin) · UTEP defense in 3 (2 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

49.4%

#271

51.5%

Stronger#185

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

15.2%

#232

15.6%

Stronger#108

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

24.6%

#341

32.8%

slight#295

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

24.3%

#217Stronger

29.8%

#306

Season box-score numbers; ranks of 361 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.

Key numbers and mismatchesiHeadline ratings, then the biggest mismatches between one team's offense and the other's defense.◷History

UTEPSEA

−9.5 299thNet rating?Points scored minus points allowed per 100 possessions133rd +2.5

100.9 325thOffensive rating?Points scored per 100 possessions310th 102.1

110.3 196thDefensive rating?Points allowed per 100 possessions (rank 1 = allows least)18th 99.6

65.9 288thPace?Possessions per game (rank 1 = fastest)177th 68.2

Expected pace: about 67 possessions a team (the two teams' average). Rank among 361 teams, 1st = best.

Where one side has the better of it

• 
  SEA getting to the line

  SEA offense 24.3% (217th) vs UTEP defense allowing 29.8% (306th)
  +89 spots

ContextiEach team's last ten days going into this game (filled = home, outline = road; travel distance is not tracked)◷History

last 10 days

FSSMTWTFSGame

UTEP

SEA

11 days rest

FSSMTWTFSGame

SEA

TXST

UCSB

UTEP

7 days rest

homeroadday offthis gameFrom the schedule; travel distance is not tracked.

UTEP · last 10

8-20 · 11 days rest

• Nov 25 @ UABL 59–75
• Nov 24 vs W&ML 63–74
• Nov 15 @ USUL 51–75
• Nov 11 vs LMUL 58–71
• Mar 12 @ LIB2024–25L 60–81
• Mar 11 vs SHSU2024–25W 79–65
• Mar 8 @ LT2024–25L 58–76
• Mar 6 @ SHSU2024–25L 87–89
• Mar 1 vs MTSU2024–25L 75–76
• Feb 27 vs WKU2024–25L 73–80

1-9 in these

SEA · last 10

18-13 · 7 days rest

• Nov 29 @ UCSBL 71–74
• Nov 28 vs TXSTW 66–52
• Nov 21 @ STANW 77–69
• Nov 15 vs IDSTW 83–74
• Nov 12 vs EWUW 94–67
• Nov 8 vs CPL 71–73
• Nov 3 vs DENW 84–73
• Mar 14 @ UVU2024–25L 55–68
• Mar 13 @ ACU2024–25W 69–63
• Mar 8 @ UTU2024–25W 70–65

7-3 in these

From box scores. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM and Caesars; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.