New Haven vs Boston College — College Basketball, Dec 6, 2025

Boston College beat New Haven 67–63 at home on Dec 6, 2025.

FinalSat, Dec 6

New Haven Chargers

10-16 · 4-11 on the road

63

Boston College Eagles

11-20 · 10-10 at home

67

RecapPropsStatsHead to head

Line score◷History

Team	1st	2nd	Final
NHVN	33	30	63
BC	23	44	67

Top performersiEach team's three leading scorers in this game, with rebounds and assists. The full box score is below.◷History

New Haven Chargers

• Jabri FitzpatrickG

  16 pts · 6 reb · 1 ast
  4-15 FG

  0-5 3PT
• Najimi GeorgeG

  14 pts · 2 reb · 1 ast
  4-9 FG

  1-4 3PT
• Andre PashaF

  13 pts · 6 reb · 1 ast
  5-12 FG

  3-7 3PT

Boston College Eagles

• Fred PayneG

  18 pts · 4 reb · 2 ast
  7-13 FG

  4-7 3PT
• Donald Hand Jr.G

  13 pts · 3 reb
  3-7 FG

  2-4 3PT
• Luka ToewsG

  12 pts · 1 reb · 2 ast
  4-7 FG

  2-5 3PT

Box score◷History

every player+

NHVN	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Najimi George	39	14	2	1	1	0	1	4-9	1-4	5-6	—
Jabri Fitzpatrick	38	16	6	1	1	0	2	4-15	0-5	8-10	—
Andre Pasha	36	13	6	1	2	1	2	5-12	3-7	0-0	—
Stefano Faloppa	30	10	9	2	2	1	3	2-4	1-2	5-6	—
Kheni Briggs	13	2	1	0	0	0	0	0-1	0-1	2-2	—
Maison Adeleye	27	8	2	2	3	0	1	4-6	0-2	0-0	—
Teshaun Steele	10	0	3	2	0	0	0	0-1	0-1	0-0	—
Tristan Burth	4	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-1	0-0	0-0	—
Vere Anthony	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Zoumana Traore	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		63	29	9	9	2	9	19-49	5-22	20-24

BC	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Donald Hand Jr.	34	13	3	0	0	1	1	3-7	2-4	5-7	—
Jayden Hastings	28	7	5	2	2	2	3	1-2	0-0	5-6	—
Aidan Shaw	22	1	4	0	0	0	0	0-1	0-0	1-2	—
Luka Toews	21	12	1	2	1	0	5	4-7	2-5	2-2	—
Caleb Steger	13	2	1	0	0	0	3	1-3	0-1	0-0	—
Fred Payne	33	18	4	2	0	0	1	7-13	4-7	0-0	—
Jason Asemota	15	8	7	0	0	1	0	3-7	2-5	0-0	—
Boden Kapke	15	1	5	0	0	0	0	0-2	0-0	1-2	—
Chase Forte	13	5	3	0	0	0	2	1-6	0-3	3-4	—
Marko Radunovic	6	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		67	33	6	3	4	15	20-48	10-25	17-23

Starters first, then by minutes. +/- is the team's point margin while he was on the floor.

Team statsiTeam stats: green marks the better side; a longer bar is a bigger number, not always a better one.◷History

NHVNBC

38.8%

Field goals?Made-attempted: away 19-49, home 20-48.

41.7%

22.7%

Three-pointers?Made-attempted: away 5-22, home 10-25.

40.0%

83.3%

Free throws?Made-attempted: away 20-24, home 17-23.

73.9%

31

Rebounds

34

9

Offensive rebounds

11

9

Assists

6

10

Turnovers?Fewer is better.

15

9

Steals

3

2

Blocks

4

24

Points in the paint

12

4

Fast-break points

12

19

Fouls?Fewer is better.

17

This game's box score totals; green marks the better side (fewer turnovers and fouls are better).

See the model’s call (graded) →

Going into the game · matchup numbers, form, rest+

Offense vs defense: the four factorsiEach offense's league rank against the defense it faces in shooting, turnovers, rebounding and free throws; longer = better.◷History

ranks betterranks worseStronger72+ places apartleague middleLonger bar = better rank of 361 (#1 = best)

NHVN offensevsBC defense

NHVN offense ranks better in 0 of 4 matchups · BC defense in 4 (3 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

48.0%

#310

48.9%

Stronger#63

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

16.5%

#307

13.0%

slight#298

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

22.0%

#353

28.6%

Stronger#90

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

21.7%

#299

23.2%

Stronger#101

BC offensevsNHVN defense

BC offense ranks better in 1 of 4 matchups · NHVN defense in 3 (3 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

47.0%

#334

51.6%

Stronger#187

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

13.4%

#88slight

15.1%

#137

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

28.3%

#254

27.2%

Stronger#43

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

21.2%

#311

20.5%

Stronger#39

Season box-score numbers; ranks of 361 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.

Key numbers and mismatchesiHeadline ratings, then the biggest mismatches between one team's offense and the other's defense.◷History

NHVNBC

−10.6 310thNet rating?Points scored minus points allowed per 100 possessions247th −4.9

96.2 351stOffensive rating?Points scored per 100 possessions324th 101.0

106.7 104thDefensive rating?Points allowed per 100 possessions (rank 1 = allows least)86th 105.9

62.9 360thPace?Possessions per game (rank 1 = fastest)251st 66.8

Expected pace: about 65 possessions a team (the two teams' average). Rank among 361 teams, 1st = best.

Where one side has the better of it

• 
  BC turnovers

  BC offense 13.4% (88th) vs NHVN defense allowing 15.1% (137th)
  +49 spots

ContextiEach team's last ten days going into this game (filled = home, outline = road; travel distance is not tracked)◷History

last 10 days

TFSSMTWTFGame

NHVN

BC

17 days rest

TFSSMTWTFGame

BC

LSU

NHVN

2 days rest6th straight home game

homeroadday offthis gameFrom the schedule; travel distance is not tracked.

NHVN · last 6

10-16 · 17 days rest

• Nov 18 @ HALLL 45–68
• Nov 15 vs DSUW 65–52
• Nov 10 @ UMLW 73–67
• Nov 8 vs PSUL 43–87
• Nov 7 vs COLUL 53–71
• Nov 3 @ CONNL 55–79

2-4 in these

BC · last 10

11-20 · 2 days rest

• Dec 3 vs LSUL 69–78
• Nov 26 vs HARVW 73–60
• Nov 23 vs TULNL 90–93
• Nov 21 vs DAVL 49–59
• Nov 18 vs HAMPW 63–52
• Nov 15 @ TEMW 76–71
• Nov 11 vs CCSUL 59–60
• Nov 6 vs CITW 76–47
• Nov 3 @ FAUL 78–83
• Mar 8 @ PITT2024–25L 67–93

4-6 in these

From box scores. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM and Caesars; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.