Rhode Island vs Towson — College Basketball, Nov 24, 2025

Towson beat Rhode Island 62–55 at a neutral site on Nov 24, 2025.

FinalMon, Nov 24Neutral site

Rhode Island Rams

16-16 · 6-9 on the road

55

Towson Tigers

17-15 · 11-3 at home

62

RecapPropsStatsHead to head

Line score◷History

Team	1st	2nd	Final
URI	21	34	55
TOW	25	37	62

Top performersiEach team's three leading scorers in this game, with rebounds and assists. The full box score is below.◷History

Rhode Island Rams

• Myles CoreyG

  14 pts · 2 reb
  6-9 FG

  1-4 3PT
• Jonah HintonG

  13 pts · 5 reb · 1 ast
  2-10 FG

  2-9 3PT
• Keeyan ItejereF

  9 pts · 9 reb · 1 ast
  4-5 FG

Towson Tigers

• Dylan WilliamsonG

  25 pts · 3 reb · 3 ast
  10-21 FG

  5-9 3PT
• Tyler TejadaG

  16 pts · 3 reb · 1 ast
  5-9 FG

  0-1 3PT
• Jack Doumbia Jr.F

  16 pts · 4 reb · 3 stl
  5-13 FG

  0-2 3PT

Box score◷History

every player+

URI	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Keeyan Itejere	39	9	9	1	1	0	2	4-5	0-0	1-3	—
Tyler Cochran	35	7	2	1	2	0	2	3-11	0-5	1-1	—
Jonah Hinton	32	13	5	1	0	0	3	2-10	2-9	7-8	—
Alex Crawford	27	4	5	0	1	1	2	2-5	0-3	0-0	—
Myles Corey	26	14	2	0	0	0	3	6-9	1-4	1-3	—
RJ Johnson	22	6	1	3	0	0	2	3-5	0-2	0-0	—
Jahmere Tripp	13	0	4	0	3	0	1	0-4	0-1	0-1	—
Damone King	5	2	0	0	0	0	0	1-1	0-0	0-0	—
Drissa Traore	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		55	28	6	7	2	15	21-50	3-24	10-16

TOW	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Dylan Williamson	39	25	3	3	1	0	3	10-21	5-9	0-0	—
Tyler Tejada	37	16	3	1	0	0	2	5-9	0-1	6-6	—
Chike Ndefo	22	2	7	1	1	1	0	1-1	0-0	0-0	—
Tyler Schmidt	13	0	2	1	1	0	1	0-1	0-1	0-0	—
Abdou Samb	6	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-1	0-0	0-0	—
Jack Doumbia Jr.	31	16	4	0	3	0	2	5-13	0-2	6-8	—
Mor Seck	18	3	3	0	1	0	2	1-1	0-0	1-2	—
Tyler Coleman	16	0	2	0	1	1	0	0-1	0-0	0-0	—
Caleb Embeya	15	0	6	0	4	0	0	0-2	0-0	0-3	—
Ryan Conway	3	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		62	30	6	12	2	10	22-50	5-13	13-19

Starters first, then by minutes. +/- is the team's point margin while he was on the floor.

Team statsiTeam stats: green marks the better side; a longer bar is a bigger number, not always a better one.◷History

URITOW

42.0%

Field goals?Made-attempted: away 21-50, home 22-50.

44.0%

12.5%

Three-pointers?Made-attempted: away 3-24, home 5-13.

38.5%

62.5%

Free throws?Made-attempted: away 10-16, home 13-19.

68.4%

31

Rebounds

35

10

Offensive rebounds

11

6

Assists

6

15

Turnovers?Fewer is better.

12

7

Steals

12

2

Blocks

2

28

Points in the paint

24

7

Fast-break points

4

18

Fouls?Fewer is better.

18

This game's box score totals; green marks the better side (fewer turnovers and fouls are better).

See the model’s call (graded) →

Going into the game · matchup numbers, form, rest+

Offense vs defense: the four factorsiEach offense's league rank against the defense it faces in shooting, turnovers, rebounding and free throws; longer = better.◷History

ranks betterranks worseStronger72+ places apartleague middleLonger bar = better rank of 361 (#1 = best)

URI offensevsTOW defense

URI offense ranks better in 0 of 4 matchups · TOW defense in 4 (1 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

50.1%

#228

48.5%

Stronger#51

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

16.7%

#315

13.2%

slight#286

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

31.0%

#159

29.1%

slight#117

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

27.7%

#101

20.3%

slight#35

TOW offensevsURI defense

TOW offense ranks better in 1 of 4 matchups (1 by a clear margin) · URI defense in 3 (1 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

46.5%

#341

50.4%

Stronger#125

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

13.2%

#71

18.5%

slight#11

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

36.0%

#26Stronger

31.8%

#241

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

21.0%

#315

30.0%

slight#311

Season box-score numbers; ranks of 361 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.

Key numbers and mismatchesiHeadline ratings, then the biggest mismatches between one team's offense and the other's defense.◷History

URITOW

+2.6 132ndNet rating?Points scored minus points allowed per 100 possessions165th +1.0

106.2 245thOffensive rating?Points scored per 100 possessions258th 105.7

103.7 52ndDefensive rating?Points allowed per 100 possessions (rank 1 = allows least)69th 104.7

65.8 293rdPace?Possessions per game (rank 1 = fastest)355th 63.4

Expected pace: about 65 possessions a team (the two teams' average). Rank among 361 teams, 1st = best.

Where one side has the better of it

• 
  TOW offensive rebounding

  TOW offense 36.0% (26th) vs URI defense allowing 31.8% (241st)
  +215 spots

ContextiEach team's last ten days going into this game (filled = home, outline = road; travel distance is not tracked)◷History

last 10 days

SSMTWTFSSGame

URI

YALE

TOW

5 days rest

SSMTWTFSSGame

TOW

JMU

URI

5 days rest

homeroadday offthis gameFrom the schedule; travel distance is not tracked.

URI · last 10

16-16 · 5 days rest

• Nov 18 @ YALEW 86–77
• Nov 14 vs UALBW 80–61
• Nov 11 vs STOW 80–57
• Nov 7 vs TLSAL 65–82
• Nov 3 vs STETW 93–62
• Mar 12 vs FOR2024–25L 71–88
• Mar 8 vs FOR2024–25W 86–67
• Mar 5 @ JOES2024–25L 74–91
• Mar 1 @ MASS2024–25L 88–91
• Feb 26 vs DAY2024–25L 77–85

5-5 in these

TOW · last 10

17-15 · 5 days rest

• Nov 18 @ JMUL 75–81
• Nov 14 vs NORFW 51–41
• Nov 8 @ HOUL 48–65
• Nov 3 @ L-MDW 67–56
• Mar 10 vs DEL2024–25L 72–82
• Mar 9 vs DREX2024–25W 82–76
• Mar 1 vs HAMP2024–25W 75–72
• Feb 27 vs W&M2024–25W 88–73
• Feb 22 @ CAM2024–25W 76–67
• Feb 20 @ ELON2024–25L 63–69

6-4 in these

From box scores. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM and Caesars; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.