Mount St. Mary's vs Cincinnati — College Basketball, Nov 16, 2025

Cincinnati beat Mount St. Mary's 72–55 at home on Nov 16, 2025.

FinalSun, Nov 16

Mount St. Mary's Mountaineers

13-17 · 6-12 on the road

55

Cincinnati Bearcats

18-15 · 16-4 at home

72

RecapPropsStatsHead to head

Line score◷History

Team	1st	2nd	Final
MSM	36	19	55
CIN	30	42	72

Top performersiEach team's three leading scorers in this game, with rebounds and assists. The full box score is below.◷History

Mount St. Mary's Mountaineers

• Xavier LipscombG

  14 pts · 8 reb · 4 ast
  5-8 FG

  3-6 3PT
• Trey DeveauxF

  11 pts · 2 reb · 1 ast
  4-12 FG

  3-7 3PT
• Luke McEldonF

  9 pts · 6 reb · 1 ast
  4-10 FG

  0-1 3PT

Cincinnati Bearcats

• Day Day ThomasG

  16 pts · 5 reb · 5 ast
  4-6 FG

  3-3 3PT
• Baba MillerF

  13 pts · 11 reb · 1 ast · 3 stl · 4 blk · Double-double
  5-9 FG

  0-1 3PT
• Moustapha ThiamC

  13 pts · 10 reb · 1 ast · 4 blk · Double-double
  5-9 FG

  0-3 3PT

Box score◷History

every player+

MSM	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Xavier Lipscomb	35	14	8	4	0	0	4	5-8	3-6	1-2	—
Trey Deveaux	31	11	2	1	0	0	3	4-12	3-7	0-2	—
Luke McEldon	25	9	6	1	0	0	3	4-10	0-1	1-3	—
Mason So	24	4	6	3	0	0	4	2-3	0-1	0-0	—
Justin Amadi	21	3	4	0	0	0	1	1-5	0-0	1-3	—
Anastasios Rozakeas	24	6	5	0	0	0	0	2-5	2-4	0-0	—
Arlandus Keyes	24	6	1	3	1	0	2	2-9	2-6	0-0	—
Patrick Haigh	7	0	0	0	0	0	1	0-2	0-2	0-0	—
Yakhya Diop	6	2	1	0	0	1	1	1-1	0-0	0-0	—
Elijah Espinosa	3	0	1	0	0	0	0	0-1	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		55	34	12	1	1	19	21-56	10-27	3-10

CIN	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Baba Miller	33	13	11	1	3	4	1	5-9	0-1	3-4	—
Kerr Kriisa	32	3	1	5	0	0	3	1-9	1-9	0-0	—
Moustapha Thiam	27	13	10	1	2	4	1	5-9	0-3	3-6	—
Day Day Thomas	26	16	5	5	1	0	2	4-6	3-3	5-6	—
Shon Abaev	21	9	2	1	1	0	1	3-11	0-6	3-5	—
Sencire Harris	22	8	5	1	0	0	1	3-8	0-1	2-4	—
Keyshuan Tillery	14	9	3	0	1	0	0	3-6	2-3	1-3	—
Jalen Celestine	12	0	1	1	0	0	0	0-4	0-3	0-0	—
Halvine Dzellat	10	1	5	0	0	0	0	0-2	0-0	1-2	—
Tyler McKinley	3	0	0	0	0	0	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		72	43	15	8	8	10	24-64	6-29	18-30

Starters first, then by minutes. +/- is the team's point margin while he was on the floor.

Team statsiTeam stats: green marks the better side; a longer bar is a bigger number, not always a better one.◷History

MSMCIN

37.5%

Field goals?Made-attempted: away 21-56, home 24-64.

37.5%

37.0%

Three-pointers?Made-attempted: away 10-27, home 6-29.

20.7%

30.0%

Free throws?Made-attempted: away 3-10, home 18-30.

60.0%

36

Rebounds

46

7

Offensive rebounds

15

12

Assists

15

19

Turnovers?Fewer is better.

10

1

Steals

8

1

Blocks

8

18

Points in the paint

34

0

Fast-break points

16

23

Fouls?Fewer is better.

13

This game's box score totals; green marks the better side (fewer turnovers and fouls are better).

See the model’s call (graded) →

Going into the game · matchup numbers, form, rest+

Offense vs defense: the four factorsiEach offense's league rank against the defense it faces in shooting, turnovers, rebounding and free throws; longer = better.◷History

ranks betterranks worseStronger72+ places apartleague middleLonger bar = better rank of 361 (#1 = best)

MSM offensevsCIN defense

MSM offense ranks better in 0 of 4 matchups · CIN defense in 4 (3 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

50.2%

#226

47.3%

Stronger#27

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

19.4%

#357

16.1%

Stronger#81

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

32.6%

#101

27.3%

slight#52

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

22.7%

#258

21.3%

Stronger#55

CIN offensevsMSM defense

CIN offense ranks better in 1 of 4 matchups · MSM defense in 3 (2 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

50.5%

#215

47.5%

Stronger#32

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

14.7%

#195slight

13.4%

#266

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

30.6%

#177

28.8%

Stronger#99

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

20.0%

#336

28.4%

slight#275

Season box-score numbers; ranks of 361 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.

Key numbers and mismatchesiHeadline ratings, then the biggest mismatches between one team's offense and the other's defense.◷History

MSMCIN

−5.2 249thNet rating?Points scored minus points allowed per 100 possessions70th +8.1

100.7 327thOffensive rating?Points scored per 100 possessions244th 106.3

105.9 88thDefensive rating?Points allowed per 100 possessions (rank 1 = allows least)11th 98.2

67.2 228thPace?Possessions per game (rank 1 = fastest)141st 68.8

Expected pace: about 68 possessions a team (the two teams' average). Rank among 361 teams, 1st = best.

Where one side has the better of it

• 
  CIN turnovers

  CIN offense 14.7% (195th) vs MSM defense allowing 13.4% (266th)
  +71 spots

ContextiEach team's last ten days going into this game (filled = home, outline = road; travel distance is not tracked)◷History

last 10 days

FSSMTWTFSGame

MSM

BUCK

CIN

8 days rest

FSSMTWTFSGame

CIN

GAST

DAY

MSM

4 days rest4th straight home game

homeroadday offthis gameFrom the schedule; travel distance is not tracked.

MSM · last 10

13-17 · 8 days rest

• Nov 7 vs BUCKL 62–73
• Nov 4 @ WVUL 54–70
• Mar 21 @ DUKE2024–25L 49–93
• Mar 19 @ AMER2024–25W 83–72
• Mar 15 @ IONA2024–25W 63–49
• Mar 14 @ MRMK2024–25W 57–55
• Mar 13 @ MRST2024–25W 62–58
• Mar 8 vs MRST2024–25W 62–52
• Mar 6 @ QUIN2024–25L 70–79
• Mar 2 vs SIE2024–25W 85–79

6-4 in these

CIN · last 10

18-15 · 4 days rest

• Nov 11 vs DAYW 74–62
• Nov 7 vs GASTW 74–64
• Nov 3 vs WCUW 94–63
• Apr 3 vs UCF2024–25L 80–88
• Apr 1 vs DEP2024–25W 83–61
• Mar 12 @ ISU2024–25L 56–76
• Mar 11 @ OKST2024–25W 87–68
• Mar 8 @ OKST2024–25L 67–78
• Mar 5 vs KSU2024–25L 49–54
• Mar 1 @ HOU2024–25L 64–73

5-5 in these

From box scores. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM and Caesars; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.