Quinnipiac vs Maine — College Basketball, Nov 16, 2025

Quinnipiac beat Maine 70–64 at Maine on Nov 16, 2025.

FinalSun, Nov 16

Quinnipiac Bobcats

18-13 · 9-7 on the road

70

Maine Black Bears

7-24 · 3-9 at home

64

RecapPropsStatsHead to head

Line score◷History

Team	1st	2nd	Final
QUIN	28	42	70
ME	36	28	64

Top performersiEach team's three leading scorers in this game, with rebounds and assists. The full box score is below.◷History

Quinnipiac Bobcats

• Amarri MonroeF

  17 pts · 13 reb · 4 ast · Double-double
  6-15 FG

  0-3 3PT
• Keith McKnightG

  11 pts · 5 reb
  2-9 FG

  0-1 3PT
• Jaden ZimmermanG

  10 pts · 1 reb
  2-11 FG

  1-6 3PT

Maine Black Bears

• TJ BielF

  17 pts · 2 reb · 4 blk
  6-10 FG

  3-4 3PT
• Keelan SteeleF

  14 pts · 6 reb · 3 ast · 3 stl · 4 blk
  6-10 FG

  0-1 3PT
• Ryan MabreyG

  11 pts · 5 reb · 3 ast · 3 stl
  4-8 FG

  2-5 3PT

Box score◷History

every player+

QUIN	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Amarri Monroe	40	17	13	4	2	0	3	6-15	0-3	5-5	—
Spence Wewe	23	8	9	1	0	2	1	4-4	0-0	0-0	—
Grant Randall	23	7	6	0	1	1	0	3-5	0-2	1-2	—
Asim Jones	21	2	1	3	1	0	3	1-5	0-0	0-0	—
Jaden Zimmerman	20	10	1	0	0	1	2	2-11	1-6	5-7	—
Keith McKnight	28	11	5	0	2	0	0	2-9	0-1	7-10	—
Nate Guerengomba	24	6	3	1	0	2	1	3-7	0-0	0-3	—
Tai Turnage	15	6	4	1	1	0	0	1-4	1-3	3-4	—
Samson Reilly	5	3	0	1	0	0	1	1-2	1-2	0-0	—
Ronell Giles Jr.	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-1	0-1	0-0	—
Totals		70	42	11	7	6	11	23-63	3-18	21-31

ME	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
TJ Biel	34	17	2	0	0	4	0	6-10	3-4	2-2	—
Keelan Steele	27	14	6	3	3	4	2	6-10	0-1	2-3	—
Mekhi Gray	27	8	3	1	0	0	1	1-5	0-2	6-6	—
Caleb Crawford	19	5	1	2	0	0	3	2-6	1-3	0-0	—
Logan Carey	11	2	1	1	0	0	2	1-4	0-1	0-0	—
Ryan Mabrey	26	11	5	3	3	0	1	4-8	2-5	1-1	—
Bashir N'Galang	21	7	2	3	1	0	2	2-5	0-0	3-9	—
Ace Flagg	19	0	6	2	1	0	0	0-5	0-3	0-0	—
Isaac Bonilla	8	0	1	1	0	0	0	0-1	0-1	0-0	—
Yanis Bamba	8	0	2	0	1	0	0	0-2	0-1	0-0	—
Totals		64	29	16	9	8	11	22-56	6-21	14-21

Starters first, then by minutes. +/- is the team's point margin while he was on the floor.

Team statsiTeam stats: green marks the better side; a longer bar is a bigger number, not always a better one.◷History

QUINME

36.5%

Field goals?Made-attempted: away 23-63, home 22-56.

39.3%

16.7%

Three-pointers?Made-attempted: away 3-18, home 6-21.

28.6%

67.7%

Free throws?Made-attempted: away 21-31, home 14-21.

66.7%

47

Rebounds

32

18

Offensive rebounds

9

11

Assists

16

12

Turnovers?Fewer is better.

11

7

Steals

9

6

Blocks

8

34

Points in the paint

28

19

Fast-break points

17

19

Fouls?Fewer is better.

26

This game's box score totals; green marks the better side (fewer turnovers and fouls are better).

See the model’s call (graded) →

Going into the game · matchup numbers, form, rest+

Offense vs defense: the four factorsiEach offense's league rank against the defense it faces in shooting, turnovers, rebounding and free throws; longer = better.◷History

ranks betterranks worseStronger72+ places apartleague middleLonger bar = better rank of 361 (#1 = best)

QUIN offensevsME defense

QUIN offense ranks better in 1 of 4 matchups (1 by a clear margin) · ME defense in 3 (2 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

48.2%

#307

50.6%

Stronger#133

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

13.6%

#99

16.6%

slight#49

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

34.1%

#64Stronger

34.3%

#319

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

23.4%

#236

23.4%

Stronger#107

ME offensevsQUIN defense

ME offense ranks better in 0 of 4 matchups · QUIN defense in 4 (4 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

49.6%

#262

48.9%

Stronger#66

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

17.7%

#345

15.1%

Stronger#132

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

19.7%

#360

32.0%

Stronger#249

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

24.7%

#210

22.4%

Stronger#83

Season box-score numbers; ranks of 361 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.

Key numbers and mismatchesiHeadline ratings, then the biggest mismatches between one team's offense and the other's defense.◷History

QUINME

+2.2 140thNet rating?Points scored minus points allowed per 100 possessions318th −11.4

106.5 241stOffensive rating?Points scored per 100 possessions353rd 95.3

104.3 63rdDefensive rating?Points allowed per 100 possessions (rank 1 = allows least)102nd 106.7

69.6 97thPace?Possessions per game (rank 1 = fastest)344th 64.2

Expected pace: about 67 possessions a team (the two teams' average). Rank among 361 teams, 1st = best.

Where one side has the better of it

• 
  QUIN offensive rebounding

  QUIN offense 34.1% (64th) vs ME defense allowing 34.3% (319th)
  +255 spots

ContextiEach team's last ten days going into this game (filled = home, outline = road; travel distance is not tracked)◷History

last 10 days

FSSMTWTFSGame

QUIN

YALE

ME

4 days rest

FSSMTWTFSGame

ME

STBK

RUTG

QUIN

5 days rest

homeroadday offthis gameFrom the schedule; travel distance is not tracked.

QUIN · last 10

18-13 · 4 days rest

• Nov 11 vs YALEL 60–97
• Nov 6 vs CCSUW 71–49
• Nov 3 @ SJUL 74–108
• Mar 14 vs IONA2024–25L 73–81
• Mar 12 vs RID2024–25W 78–64
• Mar 8 @ FAIR2024–25L 74–83
• Mar 6 vs MSM2024–25W 79–70
• Mar 2 @ MRMK2024–25L 63–73
• Feb 28 vs SPU2024–25W 69–64
• Feb 23 @ MAN2024–25W 74–71

5-5 in these

ME · last 10

7-24 · 5 days rest

• Nov 10 @ RUTGL 60–72
• Nov 8 @ STBKL 60–71
• Nov 3 @ GWL 47–67
• Mar 15 @ BRY2024–25L 59–79
• Mar 11 @ UVM2024–25W 57–42
• Mar 8 vs UML2024–25W 72–64
• Mar 4 vs UML2024–25W 71–70
• Mar 1 vs BRY2024–25L 72–80
• Feb 27 @ UNH2024–25W 73–66
• Feb 22 @ BING2024–25L 69–71

4-6 in these

From box scores. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM and Caesars; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.