Loading the game…
⌘K
Indiana beat Milwaukee 101–70 at home on Nov 12, 2025.
| Team | 1st | 2nd | Final |
|---|---|---|---|
  MILW | 39 | 31 | 70 |
  IU | 51 | 50 | 101 |
Milwaukee PanthersIndiana Hoosiers| MILW | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3PT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danilo Jovanovich | 33 | 18 | 6 | 1 | 8-11 | 0-0 |
| Seth Hubbard | 33 | 17 | 5 | 0 | 8-18 | 0-4 |
| Amar Augillard | 26 | 14 | 5 | 3 | 5-12 | 3-6 |
| Esyah Pippa-White | 24 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 2-5 | 1-3 |
| Faizon Fields | 22 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Josh Dixon | 16 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 3-6 | 1-2 |
| Stevie Elam | 14 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-4 | 0-2 |
| Tate Mackenzie | 10 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Aaron Franklin | 9 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| Isaiah Dorceus | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Sekou Konneh | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Simeon Murchison | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Chandler Jackson | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Totals | 70 | 27 | 7 | 29-62 | 5-17 |
| IU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3PT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tayton Conerway | 34 | 21 | 2 | 6 | 8-11 | 1-4 |
| Tucker DeVries | 33 | 12 | 5 | 2 | 4-10 | 2-5 |
| Lamar Wilkerson | 31 | 24 | 1 | 2 | 7-12 | 5-6 |
| Reed Bailey | 26 | 14 | 5 | 5 | 4-6 | 1-1 |
| Conor Enright | 26 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 2-5 | 1-4 |
| Trent Sisley | 14 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 2-3 | 2-2 |
| Jasai Miles | 12 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 2-4 | 1-3 |
| Sam Alexis | 11 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| Nick Dorn | 7 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 3-6 | 1-3 |
| Ian Stephens | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Tryce Grensing | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Drew Snively | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Totals | 101 | 31 | 23 | 34-60 | 14-28 |
Starters first, then by minutes. +/- is the team's point margin while he was on the floor.
This game's box score totals; green marks the better side (fewer turnovers and fouls are better).
MILW offense ranks better in 2 of 4 matchups (1 by a clear margin) · IU defense in 2 (1 by a clear margin)
IU offense ranks better in 3 of 4 matchups (3 by a clear margin) · MILW defense in 1 (1 by a clear margin)
Season box-score numbers; ranks of 361 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.
MILWIUExpected pace: about 67 possessions a team (the two teams' average). Rank among 361 teams, 1st = best.
MILWIUNo lines posted yet: research the rotation against any number
Seth Hubbard's full breakdown holds the game-by-game chart, hit-rate splits and filters, the what-if line and market curve, every book and the line history, closing lines, the projected range, teammates and matchup tools. Checking your player views…
Checking your player views…| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seth Hubbard | 31.7 | 19.3 | 2.3 | 1.3 |
| Danilo Jovanovich | 27.7 | 8.3 | 6.7 | 2.7 |
| Isaiah Dorceus | 22.0 | 4.3 | 2.0 | 5.0 |
| Stevie Elam | 19.7 | 10.3 | 4.7 | 1.0 |
| Amar Augillard | 19.0 | 12.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| Esyah Pippa-White | 18.3 | 7.3 | 1.7 | 1.7 |
| Faizon Fields | 16.7 | 7.3 | 4.3 | 1.3 |
| Aaron Franklin | 12.7 | 4.3 | 3.3 | 0.3 |
MILW offenseper gameIU defenseRank among 361 teams, 1st = best; a longer bar is a better rank. A defense ranks well for allowing less: lower shooting percentages, fewer points and rebounds, more turnovers forced.
MILWForAgainst46% of MILW's points come in the first half, 47% for the average team.
IUForAgainst49% of IU's points come in the first half, 47% for the average team.
Average points per game in each period, from box scores, over a team's last 17 games; overtime is pooled into the second half and the game. History, not a forecast: a team that leads late plays differently than one that trails, and a small window swings.
MILW 0series1 IU| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2025 | MILW 70 | IU 101 | IU+31 | +31 |
From box scores. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM and Caesars; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.
