Stonehill vs Rhode Island — College Basketball, Nov 11, 2025

Rhode Island beat Stonehill 80–57 at home on Nov 11, 2025.

FinalTue, Nov 11

Stonehill Skyhawks

9-20 · 4-14 on the road

57

Rhode Island Rams

16-16 · 10-7 at home

80

RecapPropsStatsHead to head

Line score◷History

Team	1st	2nd	Final
STO	21	36	57
URI	39	41	80

Top performersiEach team's three leading scorers in this game, with rebounds and assists. The full box score is below.◷History

Stonehill Skyhawks

• Hermann KoffiG

  16 pts · 5 reb · 1 ast
  5-14 FG

  4-9 3PT
• Raymond Espinal-GuzmanF

  8 pts · 9 reb · 1 ast
  2-4 FG

  0-1 3PT
• William BatchelderG

  8 pts · 2 reb · 1 ast
  3-14 FG

  2-10 3PT

Rhode Island Rams

• Tyler CochranG

  16 pts · 7 reb · 2 ast · 9 stl
  5-10 FG

  0-4 3PT
• Jonah HintonG

  16 pts · 6 reb · 1 ast
  5-13 FG

  2-8 3PT
• RJ JohnsonG

  15 pts · 2 reb · 1 ast
  5-8 FG

  1-1 3PT

Box score◷History

every player+

STO	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Hermann Koffi	35	16	5	1	0	0	3	5-14	4-9	2-4	—
William Batchelder	29	8	2	1	1	0	3	3-14	2-10	0-0	—
Ridvan Tutic	28	6	8	1	0	0	1	2-5	0-0	2-3	—
Raymond Espinal-Guzman	25	8	9	1	0	2	4	2-4	0-1	4-4	—
Rex Sunderland	22	7	4	4	3	0	5	2-4	2-3	1-2	—
Davante Hackett	24	5	3	2	0	0	2	2-8	0-3	1-2	—
Chas Stinson	17	4	3	1	1	1	1	0-0	0-0	4-4	—
Pearse McGuinn	11	2	0	0	0	0	0	1-2	0-1	0-0	—
Trenton Ruth	7	1	0	0	0	0	1	0-1	0-1	1-2	—
Cory Lovell	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		57	34	11	5	3	20	17-52	8-28	15-21

URI	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Tyler Cochran	32	16	7	2	9	0	1	5-10	0-4	6-7	—
Jonah Hinton	32	16	6	1	1	0	3	5-13	2-8	4-6	—
Myles Corey	19	6	2	0	1	0	1	3-7	0-2	0-0	—
Keeyan Itejere	19	4	5	1	0	1	2	2-3	0-0	0-0	—
Alex Crawford	17	5	1	1	1	0	2	2-3	0-1	1-1	—
Jahmere Tripp	26	11	2	2	3	0	2	4-7	1-1	2-2	—
Mouhamed Sow	23	5	5	0	0	0	0	2-7	0-2	1-2	—
RJ Johnson	21	15	2	1	1	0	0	5-8	1-1	4-4	—
Damone King	8	2	0	0	1	1	0	1-1	0-0	0-0	—
Jalen Harper	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Barrett Loer	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	0-1	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		80	31	8	17	2	11	29-60	4-19	18-22

Starters first, then by minutes. +/- is the team's point margin while he was on the floor.

Team statsiTeam stats: green marks the better side; a longer bar is a bigger number, not always a better one.◷History

STOURI

32.7%

Field goals?Made-attempted: away 17-52, home 29-60.

48.3%

28.6%

Three-pointers?Made-attempted: away 8-28, home 4-19.

21.1%

71.4%

Free throws?Made-attempted: away 15-21, home 18-22.

81.8%

35

Rebounds

36

12

Offensive rebounds

10

11

Assists

8

21

Turnovers?Fewer is better.

11

5

Steals

17

3

Blocks

2

16

Points in the paint

44

12

Fast-break points

22

19

Fouls?Fewer is better.

17

This game's box score totals; green marks the better side (fewer turnovers and fouls are better).

See the model’s call (graded) →

Going into the game · matchup numbers, form, rest+

Offense vs defense: the four factorsiEach offense's league rank against the defense it faces in shooting, turnovers, rebounding and free throws; longer = better.◷History

ranks betterranks worseStronger72+ places apartleague middleLonger bar = better rank of 361 (#1 = best)

STO offensevsURI defense

STO offense ranks better in 0 of 4 matchups · URI defense in 4 (2 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

46.0%

#347

50.4%

Stronger#125

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

16.9%

#326

18.5%

Stronger#11

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

27.3%

#282

31.8%

slight#241

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

18.2%

#357

30.0%

slight#311

URI offensevsSTO defense

URI offense ranks better in 1 of 4 matchups · STO defense in 3 (2 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

50.1%

#228

48.0%

Stronger#40

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

16.7%

#315slight

11.8%

#343

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

31.0%

#159

27.2%

Stronger#44

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

27.7%

#101

20.4%

slight#37

Season box-score numbers; ranks of 361 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.

Key numbers and mismatchesiHeadline ratings, then the biggest mismatches between one team's offense and the other's defense.◷History

STOURI

−9.7 302ndNet rating?Points scored minus points allowed per 100 possessions132nd +2.6

94.2 355thOffensive rating?Points scored per 100 possessions245th 106.2

103.9 59thDefensive rating?Points allowed per 100 possessions (rank 1 = allows least)52nd 103.7

66.9 243rdPace?Possessions per game (rank 1 = fastest)293rd 65.8

Expected pace: about 66 possessions a team (the two teams' average). Rank among 361 teams, 1st = best.

Where one side has the better of it

• 
  URI turnovers

  URI offense 16.7% (315th) vs STO defense allowing 11.8% (343rd)
  +28 spots

ContextiEach team's last ten days going into this game (filled = home, outline = road; travel distance is not tracked)◷History

last 10 days

SMTWTFSSMGame

STO

DEP

URI

3 days rest

SMTWTFSSMGame

URI

STET

TLSA

STO

3 days rest3rd straight home game

homeroadday offthis gameFrom the schedule; travel distance is not tracked.

STO · last 10

9-20 · 3 days rest

• Nov 7 @ DEPL 64–72
• Mar 5 @ FDU2024–25L 56–71
• Mar 1 vs LEM2024–25W 85–79
• Feb 27 @ FDU2024–25L 69–82
• Feb 22 @ CCSU2024–25L 41–67
• Feb 20 @ WAG2024–25L 57–63
• Feb 15 vs MERC2024–25W 85–73
• Feb 8 @ LIU2024–25L 59–62
• Feb 1 vs CCSU2024–25L 63–71
• Jan 30 vs WAG2024–25W 73–61

3-7 in these

URI · last 10

16-16 · 3 days rest

• Nov 7 vs TLSAL 65–82
• Nov 3 vs STETW 93–62
• Mar 12 vs FOR2024–25L 71–88
• Mar 8 vs FOR2024–25W 86–67
• Mar 5 @ JOES2024–25L 74–91
• Mar 1 @ MASS2024–25L 88–91
• Feb 26 vs DAY2024–25L 77–85
• Feb 22 @ SLU2024–25L 66–81
• Feb 15 vs LAS2024–25W 86–71
• Feb 12 vs SBU2024–25W 68–64

4-6 in these

From box scores. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM and Caesars; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.