Stonehill vs DePaul — College Basketball, Nov 7, 2025

DePaul beat Stonehill 72–64 at home on Nov 7, 2025.

FinalFri, Nov 7

Stonehill Skyhawks

9-20 · 4-14 on the road

64

DePaul Blue Demons

16-16 · 12-8 at home

72

RecapPropsStatsHead to head

Line score◷History

Team	1st	2nd	Final
STO	24	40	64
DEP	37	35	72

Top performersiEach team's three leading scorers in this game, with rebounds and assists. The full box score is below.◷History

Stonehill Skyhawks

• Hermann KoffiG

  27 pts · 5 reb
  10-16 FG

  7-10 3PT
• Chas StinsonG

  14 pts · 4 reb
  5-7 FG
• Raymond Espinal-GuzmanF

  9 pts · 10 reb · 7 ast
  3-12 FG

  1-7 3PT

DePaul Blue Demons

• CJ GunnG

  28 pts · 6 reb · 3 ast · 3 stl
  8-20 FG

  2-7 3PT
• NJ BensonF

  16 pts · 10 reb · 6 blk · Double-double
  7-10 FG

  0-1 3PT
• RJ SmithG

  8 pts · 4 reb · 1 ast
  2-6 FG

  1-3 3PT

Box score◷History

every player+

STO	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Hermann Koffi	37	27	5	0	0	1	2	10-16	7-10	0-0	—
Raymond Espinal-Guzman	36	9	10	7	2	2	3	3-12	1-7	2-2	—
William Batchelder	35	8	3	2	2	0	3	2-6	1-1	3-3	—
Rex Sunderland	24	0	7	5	0	1	2	0-4	0-2	0-0	—
Ridvan Tutic	13	0	1	2	0	0	3	0-3	0-0	0-0	—
Chas Stinson	28	14	4	0	0	1	1	5-7	0-0	4-10	—
Davante Hackett	16	4	2	0	0	0	2	2-6	0-1	0-0	—
Pearse McGuinn	7	0	1	0	0	0	0	0-1	0-1	0-0	—
Cory Lovell	3	2	0	0	0	0	0	1-1	0-0	0-0	—
Trenton Ruth	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-1	0-1	0-0	—
Totals		64	33	16	4	5	16	23-57	9-23	9-15

DEP	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
CJ Gunn	33	28	6	3	3	0	2	8-20	2-7	10-12	—
NJ Benson	31	16	10	0	0	6	1	7-10	0-1	2-10	—
Brandon Maclin	29	5	9	3	0	0	0	1-4	0-1	3-4	—
Layden Blocker	28	4	3	4	3	0	2	1-7	0-3	2-2	—
Kaleb Banks	15	2	3	0	0	0	1	1-3	0-1	0-0	—
RJ Smith	25	8	4	1	0	0	1	2-6	1-3	3-4	—
Jeremy Lorenz	16	2	2	2	2	0	0	1-3	0-1	0-0	—
Ilija Milijaševic	10	7	0	0	0	0	0	2-5	2-5	1-1	—
Théo Pierre-Justin	7	0	0	1	1	1	0	0-1	0-1	0-0	—
Kruz McClure	4	0	0	0	1	0	0	0-3	0-1	0-2	—
Khaman Maker	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		72	37	14	10	7	7	23-62	5-24	21-35

Starters first, then by minutes. +/- is the team's point margin while he was on the floor.

Team statsiTeam stats: green marks the better side; a longer bar is a bigger number, not always a better one.◷History

STODEP

40.4%

Field goals?Made-attempted: away 23-57, home 23-62.

37.1%

39.1%

Three-pointers?Made-attempted: away 9-23, home 5-24.

20.8%

60.0%

Free throws?Made-attempted: away 9-15, home 21-35.

60.0%

38

Rebounds

39

6

Offensive rebounds

8

16

Assists

14

16

Turnovers?Fewer is better.

7

4

Steals

10

5

Blocks

7

22

Points in the paint

34

4

Fast-break points

20

26

Fouls?Fewer is better.

15

This game's box score totals; green marks the better side (fewer turnovers and fouls are better).

See the model’s call (graded) →

Going into the game · matchup numbers, form, rest+

Offense vs defense: the four factorsiEach offense's league rank against the defense it faces in shooting, turnovers, rebounding and free throws; longer = better.◷History

ranks betterranks worseStronger72+ places apartleague middleLonger bar = better rank of 361 (#1 = best)

STO offensevsDEP defense

STO offense ranks better in 0 of 4 matchups · DEP defense in 4 (4 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

46.0%

#347

49.3%

Stronger#75

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

16.9%

#326

16.4%

Stronger#67

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

27.3%

#282

31.1%

Stronger#205

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

18.2%

#357

27.0%

Stronger#249

DEP offensevsSTO defense

DEP offense ranks better in 1 of 4 matchups (1 by a clear margin) · STO defense in 3 (3 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

49.8%

#240

48.0%

Stronger#40

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

15.5%

#257Stronger

11.8%

#343

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

30.0%

#195

27.2%

Stronger#44

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

24.4%

#215

20.4%

Stronger#37

Season box-score numbers; ranks of 361 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.

Key numbers and mismatchesiHeadline ratings, then the biggest mismatches between one team's offense and the other's defense.◷History

STODEP

−9.7 302ndNet rating?Points scored minus points allowed per 100 possessions164th +1.0

94.2 355thOffensive rating?Points scored per 100 possessions273rd 104.8

103.9 59thDefensive rating?Points allowed per 100 possessions (rank 1 = allows least)54th 103.8

66.9 243rdPace?Possessions per game (rank 1 = fastest)240th 67.0

Expected pace: about 67 possessions a team (the two teams' average). Rank among 361 teams, 1st = best.

Where one side has the better of it

• 
  DEP turnovers

  DEP offense 15.5% (257th) vs STO defense allowing 11.8% (343rd)
  +86 spots

ContextiEach team's last ten days going into this game (filled = home, outline = road; travel distance is not tracked)◷History

last 10 days

WTFSSMTWTGame

STO

DEP

No game in the last 3 weeks

WTFSSMTWTGame

DEP

CHST

STO

3 days rest

homeroadday offthis gameFrom the schedule; travel distance is not tracked.

STO · last 10

9-20 · 246 days rest

• Mar 5 @ FDU2024–25L 56–71
• Mar 1 vs LEM2024–25W 85–79
• Feb 27 @ FDU2024–25L 69–82
• Feb 22 @ CCSU2024–25L 41–67
• Feb 20 @ WAG2024–25L 57–63
• Feb 15 vs MERC2024–25W 85–73
• Feb 8 @ LIU2024–25L 59–62
• Feb 1 vs CCSU2024–25L 63–71
• Jan 30 vs WAG2024–25W 73–61
• Jan 26 vs FDU2024–25L 54–65

3-7 in these

DEP · last 10

16-16 · 3 days rest

• Nov 3 vs CHSTW 92–62
• Apr 1 @ CIN2024–25L 61–83
• Mar 13 @ CREI2024–25L 81–85
• Mar 12 @ GTWN2024–25W 71–67
• Mar 8 vs GTWN2024–25W 83–77
• Mar 5 @ PROV2024–25W 80–77
• Feb 26 @ CREI2024–25L 65–75
• Feb 22 vs BTLR2024–25L 72–84
• Feb 19 vs SJU2024–25L 58–82
• Feb 15 @ XAV2024–25L 68–85

4-6 in these

From box scores. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM and Caesars; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.