Stonehill vs UMass Lowell — College Basketball, Dec 12, 2026

UMass Lowell (12-18 in 2025–26) hosts Stonehill (9-20 in 2025–26) on Dec 12, 2026, 2:00 PM ET.

Sat, Dec 12, 2:00 PM ETKennedy Family Athletic Complex · Lowell, MA

Stonehill Skyhawks

2025–26: 9-20 · 4-14 on the road

UMass Lowell River Hawks

2025–26: 12-18 · 7-4 at home

Lines post the day of the game.

OverviewPropsStatsHead to head

Market◇Market

Lines post the morning of the game and are updated through the day.

Pro

Model's read

The model's winner call: locked before the start, graded in public, built on the market's price.

Winner

████ ▒▒▒██%

Start 7-day free trialSee the record

Checking your plan for the model's read…

What to knowiThree takeaways from the data below: the biggest mismatch, injuries or form, and the game setup.

Scoring margin

STO −6.5 · UML −5.7

Points scored minus allowed a game, 2025–26. Each team's own average, not a forecast.

Form

STO 3-7 · UML 6-4

Each team's record over its last ten games.

Rest

STO 6d · UML 2d

Days off before this game, from the schedule.

Offense vs defense: the four factorsiEach offense's league rank against the defense it faces in shooting, turnovers, rebounding and free throws; longer = better.◷History

ranks betterranks worseStronger72+ places apartleague middleLonger bar = better rank of 361 (#1 = best)

STO offensevsUML defense

STO offense ranks better in 0 of 4 matchups · UML defense in 4 (2 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

46.0%

#347

53.5%

slight#281

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

16.9%

#326

12.5%

slight#324

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

27.3%

#282

29.4%

Stronger#128

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

18.2%

#357

20.3%

Stronger#34

UML offensevsSTO defense

UML offense ranks better in 1 of 4 matchups (1 by a clear margin) · STO defense in 3 (2 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

49.8%

#243

48.0%

Stronger#40

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

15.5%

#256Stronger

11.8%

#343

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

32.7%

#97

27.2%

slight#44

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

22.9%

#251

20.4%

Stronger#37

Season box-score numbers; ranks of 361 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.

Key numbers and mismatchesiHeadline ratings, then the biggest mismatches between one team's offense and the other's defense.◷History

STOUML

−9.7 302ndNet rating?Points scored minus points allowed per 100 possessions287th −8.4

94.2 355thOffensive rating?Points scored per 100 possessions264th 105.2

103.9 59thDefensive rating?Points allowed per 100 possessions (rank 1 = allows least)272nd 113.5

66.9 243rdPace?Possessions per game (rank 1 = fastest)180th 68.2

Expected pace: about 68 possessions a team (the two teams' average). Rank among 361 teams, 1st = best.

Where one side has the better of it

• 
  UML turnovers

  UML offense 15.5% (256th) vs STO defense allowing 11.8% (343rd)
  +87 spots

ContextiEach team's last ten days going into this game (filled = home, outline = road; travel distance is not tracked)◷History

last 10 days

TFSSMTWTFGame

STO

HC

UML

6 days rest

TFSSMTWTFGame

UML

BC

SHU

STO

2 days rest

homeroadday offthis gameFrom the schedule; travel distance is not tracked.

STO · last 10

9-20 · 279 days rest

• Mar 7 @ MERC2025–26L 51–56
• Mar 4 @ LEM2025–26W 81–71
• Feb 28 vs MERC2025–26L 72–75
• Feb 21 vs LEM2025–26W 77–68
• Feb 19 @ NHVN2025–26L 51–64
• Feb 14 vs WAG2025–26L 57–68
• Feb 12 @ CHST2025–26L 55–68
• Feb 7 @ LIU2025–26L 54–61
• Feb 5 @ FDU2025–26L 58–74
• Jan 31 @ LEM2025–26W 65–54

3-7 in these

UML · last 10

12-18 · 276 days rest

• Mar 10 @ UMBC2025–26L 69–91
• Mar 7 vs UALB2025–26W 81–76
• Mar 3 @ ME2025–26W 67–56
• Feb 28 vs UMBC2025–26L 60–84
• Feb 26 @ UVM2025–26L 64–66
• Feb 21 vs BING2025–26W 92–79
• Feb 19 vs UNH2025–26W 78–56
• Feb 12 vs BRY2025–26W 88–69
• Feb 7 @ UALB2025–26W 89–79
• Feb 5 @ NJIT2025–26L 56–81

6-4 in these

From box scores. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM and Caesars; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.